Why Most Salesforce DevOps Tools Fail Mixed Admin + Developer Teams
Daniel RosenbergCo-Founder
Blog
Why Most Salesforce DevOps Tools Fail Mixed Admin + Developer Teams

Salesforce isn’t like other platforms. It’s a unique blend of point-and-click customization and complex code development, meaning your team likely includes both admins who work inside the Salesforce UI and developers who manage code in Git.
Most DevOps tools try to force both sides into the same workflow, which often leads to frustration, lost changes, and unreliable deployments.
This post explains why those tools fall short, and how OrgFlow takes a smarter, Git-native approach that actually works for mixed teams.
The Reality of Mixed Salesforce Teams
Salesforce teams are rarely made up of just developers. More often, they’re a mix of:
- Admins, who click and configure directly in orgs
- Developers, who write code and use Git
The challenge? Most Salesforce DevOps tools weren’t built with this mix in mind.
They force everyone, admins and devs, to work in the same way. That’s where things break.
What Goes Wrong with Traditional Tools
Let’s break down three common issues with Salesforce DevOps platforms:
1. Git is treated like a backup, not a workflow
Many tools “sync” metadata to Git after the fact. Admins make changes in the org, and the tool tries to mirror that in Git. But that approach often leads to:
- Git history that doesn’t reflect who did what
- Changes are getting overwritten or missed
- Merge conflicts; no one knows how to resolve them.
The problem isn’t syncing; it’s syncing without context.
2. Admin changes can overwrite developer work
This is the nightmare scenario: an admin makes a change in a sandbox, a developer updates the same component in Git, and whichever gets deployed last wins.
Without safeguards, Salesforce DevOps becomes a game of overwriting each other’s work.
3. Merge conflicts turn into fire drills
Salesforce metadata (like Flows, Profiles, or Layouts) is complex and XML-based. That makes it hard to merge cleanly, especially if your DevOps tool just throws changes into Git and hopes for the best.
It’s no surprise that many teams resort to manually editing XML or trying to “just deploy and fix it later.”

Why OrgFlow Works for Mixed Teams
OrgFlow takes a different approach. Yes, it syncs Git branches and Salesforce orgs, but it does more than that. It adds structure, safety, and visibility.
Let’s break it down:
1. Git Is Still the Source of Truth
OrgFlow connects Salesforce orgs and Git branches, but Git remains the authority. Changes made in the org are synced back to Git with clear visibility and smart merging.
That means:
- Developers can work in Git as usual
- Admins can work in Salesforce as usual
- Everyone’s changes are tracked in version control
This avoids the “overwrite war” that happens in other tools.
2. Smart Merging Prevents Conflicts
OrgFlow’s biggest advantage is how it handles change tracking and merging:
- Admin changes in the org are tracked and committed to the correct Git branch
- Developer changes in Git aren’t blindly overwritten by sandbox changes
- If both make changes to the same metadata, OrgFlow flags and helps resolve them with visual diffing and smart guidance
Instead of mysterious conflicts, your team sees what changed, who changed it, and how to safely merge it.
3. Admins Don’t Need to Learn Git
Admins don’t need to use the CLI, run scripts, or understand branching.
OrgFlow captures their changes in the org and safely commits them to Git. This gives admins a Git-based workflow, without Git.
It also means:
- Devs can review changes from admins
- Admin changes become part of the audit trail
- Everyone contributes to the same release process
4. Developers Keep Their Native Git Workflows
OrgFlow doesn’t replace Git. It supports it.
Developers can:
- Use GitHub pull requests
- Run CI pipelines
- Push and pull branches freely
- Write tests and track metadata history
If you love your Git workflow, OrgFlow doesn’t get in the way. It makes Git work for your entire team.
How This Solves the Real Pain
Let’s revisit the common DevOps issues and how OrgFlow addresses them.
| Problem | How OrgFlow Solves It |
|---|---|
| Git is disconnected from real changes | Git is actively updated from orgs with structure |
| Admins overwrite devs (or vice versa) | Smart merging prevents accidental overwrites |
| Merge conflicts are messy and unclear | Visual diffing makes changes clear and safe to resolve |
| Admins can’t participate in DevOps | Admin changes are automatically tracked in Git |
| Devs are forced to use unfamiliar tools | OrgFlow works with native Git, not against it |
How It’s Different from Other Tools
Most tools:
- Try to copy metadata between orgs and Git
- Don’t track who changed what
- Can’t resolve complex metadata merges
- Require extra tooling, scripting, or custom diff workflows
OrgFlow:
- Keeps Git and orgs in sync, but Git is still the source of truth
- Offers smart merging to resolve admin/dev conflicts
- Makes it easy for both devs and admins to contribute safely
- Gives architects full visibility and auditability
This makes OrgFlow the only Salesforce DevOps platform built for real-world teams, not just developers working in a vacuum.

Conclusion: A Smarter DevOps Model for Mixed Teams
Salesforce DevOps tools often break because they force everyone to work the same way, or assume everyone uses Git the same way.
But the reality is: admins and developers work differently. And that’s okay.
OrgFlow was built to support that.
- Admins get a safe, trackable way to contribute
- Developers get to use Git normally
- Architects get the control and visibility they need
- Everyone stays in sync, without risking each other’s work
If your team struggles with conflicts, overwrites, or messy release cycles, it’s not your team’s fault.
It’s the tool.
Book a demo to see how OrgFlow supports real Salesforce teams with smart syncing and Git-native workflows.